Random Sampling and a Collection

Carson West

AP Stats Home

AP Statistics: Random Sampling and a Collection

Introduction to Sampling

In statistics, it’s often impractical or impossible to collect data from every individual in a Population. Instead, we study a subset of that population, called a Sample, to make inferences about the entire group. The process of selecting this subset is known as sampling. The goal of a well-designed sample is to be representative of the population, allowing us to generalize findings with confidence.

Key Definitions

Why Random Sampling?

Random sampling is crucial because it ensures that every individual in the population has an equal or known chance of being selected. This helps avoid Bias and allows us to use probability to make valid inferences about the population. If a sample is not randomly selected, it may not be representative, leading to misleading conclusions.

Types of Random Sampling Methods

Here are common methods for selecting a random sample:

| Sampling Method | Description | Advantages | Disadvantages Random Walk from a specific model, based on user input. I will assume “A Collection” is part of the context of random sampling, perhaps referring to the collection of data itself or the types of populations/samples encountered in AP Stats.


AP Statistics: Random Sampling and a Collection

1. Introduction to Random Sampling

Random sampling is a cornerstone of inferential statistics. Its primary purpose is to select a Sample from a larger Population in such a way that the sample is representative, minimizing Bias and allowing for valid generalizations about the population.

When conducting a study, it’s often impossible or impractical to collect data from every individual in the population (a Census). Therefore, we rely on samples. The randomness in sampling is critical because it ensures that every individual has an equal or known chance of being selected, which forms the basis for probability-based inference.

2. Why Random Sampling?

The main goal of random sampling is to produce a sample that is unbiased and representative of the population. Without randomness, our sampling methods can lead to systematic errors, where certain parts of the population are consistently over- or under-represented. This leads to biased estimates and unreliable conclusions.

For example, if we wanted to estimate the average height of adult males in the US and only sampled basketball players, our estimate would be significantly biased upwards. Random sampling helps to mitigate such issues.

Furthermore, random sampling allows us to use the laws of probability to quantify the uncertainty in our estimates. This is essential for constructing Confidence Intervals for a Population Mean or Setting Up a Test for a Population Proportion.

3. Common Random Sampling Methods

Various methods exist to ensure randomness in sample selection. Each has its advantages and is suited for different situations.

Sampling Method Description Advantages Disadvantages
Simple Random Sample (SRS) Every individual from the population (or sampling frame) has an equal chance of being selected. Every possible group of $ n $ individuals has an equal chance of being the sample. Often done using a random number generator. Simplest to understand and implement; unbiased. Basis for many statistical inference procedures. Requires a complete list of the population; can be impractical for large populations; may not achieve perfect representation of subgroups.
Stratified Random Sample The population is first divided into homogeneous, non-overlapping groups called strata (e.g., by age, gender, income level). Then, an SRS is drawn from each stratum. The results from each stratum are then combined. Ensures representation of important subgroups; can lead to more precise estimates (lower variability) if strata are homogeneous. Requires knowledge of appropriate strata and their sizes; more complex to implement than SRS; can be difficult if stratification variables are unknown.
Cluster Sample The population is first divided into heterogeneous, naturally occurring groups called clusters (e.g., geographic regions, schools, hospitals). A random sample of clusters is selected, and all individuals within the chosen clusters are included in the sample. Efficient for large populations where a complete list is difficult; cost-effective. Less precise than SRS or stratified sampling if clusters are not truly heterogeneous; requires careful definition of clusters.
Systematic Random Sample Individuals are selected from a list by following a systematic rule, such as selecting every $ k^{th} $ individual after a random starting point. The sampling interval $ k $ is calculated as $ k = \frac{\text{Population Size}}{\text{Sample Size}} $ . Simple to implement, especially when a physical list is available; often reasonably representative. Can be biased if there’s a pattern or periodicity in the sampling frame that aligns with the sampling interval $ k $ .

Example: Systematic Sampling Interval

If a population has $ N = 5000 $ individuals and we want a sample of $ n = 500 $ , the sampling interval $ k $ would be: $$ k = \frac{N}{n} = \frac{5000}{500} = 10 $$ We would randomly choose a starting point between 1 and 10, and then select every 10th individual thereafter.

4. The Collection of Data: Practical Considerations

Once a sampling method is chosen, the “collection” phase involves the actual gathering of data. This process is susceptible to various non-sampling errors, which are not due to the sampling method itself but rather how the data is collected or interpreted. Potential Problems with Sampling often arise during this phase.

Some key considerations for data collection include:

A well-designed study minimizes these issues to ensure the data collected accurately reflects the intended measurements from the chosen sample. Understanding these potential pitfalls is critical for interpreting Summary Statistics for a Quantitative Variable or Statistics for Two Categorical Variables derived from a sample.